Anderson, C. W. (1979). The place of principles in policy analysis. American Political Science Review, 73(3), 711–723.
Article Google Scholar
Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Baker, R. (2003). Promoting a research agenda in education within and beyond policy and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2(3), 171–182.
Article Google Scholar
Baum, L. (2003). The supreme court in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 161–180.
Article Google Scholar
Bellamy, J. L., Bledsoe, S. E., & Traube, D. E. (2006). The current state of evidence-based practice in social work: A review of the literature and qualitative analysis of expert interviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3(1), 23–48.
Article Google Scholar
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.
Book Google Scholar
Benoit, F. (2013). Public policy models and their usefulness in public health: The stages model. National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy.
Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (2008). Research, policy, and practice: The great disconnect. V S. D. Lapan (ur.) In M. T. Quartaroli (ur.) (Eds.) Reassert essentials: an introduction to designs and practices, (pp. 295–325) Jossey- Bass, str.
Blewden, M., Carroll, P., & Witten, K. (2010). The use of social science research to inform policy development: case studies from recent immigration policy. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 5(1), 13–25.
Google Scholar
Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-based policy making: Insights from policy minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Booker, L., Conaway, C., & Schwartz, N. (2019). Five ways RPPs can fail and how to avoid them: Applying conceptual frameworks to improve RPPs. William T. Grant Foundation.
Google Scholar
Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
Article Google Scholar
Bultitude, K., Rodari, P., Weitkamp, E., BridginCherney, A., Poveyb, J., Headb, B., Borehamb, P., & Fergusonb, M. (2012). What influences the g the gap between science and policy: the importance of mutual respect, trust and the role of mediators. Journal of Science Communication, 11(3), 1–4.
Article Google Scholar
Cattaneo, K. H. (2018). Applying policy theories to charter school legislation in New York: rational actor model, stage heuristics, and multiple streams. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(2), 6–24.
Article Google Scholar
Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–34.
Article Google Scholar
Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
Article Google Scholar
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. P. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.
Article Google Scholar
Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. (2013). Research-practice partnerships at the district level: A new strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement. Wiilliam T. Grant Foundation.
Google Scholar
Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2010). Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Google Scholar
Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1983). Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 16–35.
Article Google Scholar
Cooper, A. (2014). Knowledge mobilisation in education across Canada: A cross-case analysis of 44 research brokering organisations. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(1), 29–59.
Article Google Scholar
Cooper, A., & Shewchuk, S. (2015). Knowledge brokers in education: How intermediary organizations are bridging the gap between research, policy and practice internationally. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(118), n118.
Article Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Google Scholar
DeLeon, P. (1999). The stages approach to the policy process: What has it done? Where is it going. Theories of the Policy Process, 1(19), 19–32.
Google Scholar
Donovan, M. S. (2013). Generating improvement through research and development in education systems. Science, 340(6130), 317–319.
Article Google Scholar
Edwards, A., Sebba, J., & Rickinson, M. (2007). Working with users: Some implications for educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 647–661.
Article Google Scholar
Eyler, A., Brownson, R., Schmid, T., & Pratt, M. (2010). Understanding policies and physical activity: Frontiers of knowledge to improve population health. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7(s1), S9–S12.
Article Google Scholar
Farley-Ripple, E., & Jones, A. R. (2015). Educational contracting and the translation of research into practice: the case of data coach vendors in Delaware. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 10(2), n2.
Article Google Scholar
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
Article Google Scholar
Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., & Cheng, B. H. (Eds.). (2013). Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Gelderblom, G., Schildkamp, K., Pieters, J., & Ehren, M. (2016). Data-based decision making for instructional improvement in primary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 1–14.
Article Google Scholar
Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Practice, 25, 20–24.
Article Google Scholar
Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 69–80.
Article Google Scholar
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Huberman, M. (1990). Linkages between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 363–391.
Article Google Scholar
Ion, G. & Iucu, R. (2015). Does research influence educational policy? The perspective of researchers and policy-makers in Romania. In The European higher education area (pp. 865–880). Springer.
Ion, G., Marin, E., & Proteasa, C. (2018). How does the context of research influence the use of educational research in policy-making and practice? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 18(2), 119–139.
Article Google Scholar
Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, 125, 43–62.
Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (2010). Implementing EBPs and programmes in the human services: Lessons from research in public administration. European Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 109–125.
Article Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4–12.
Article Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). HaperCollins.
Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (2010). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (3rd ed.). Longman.
Google Scholar
Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2012). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Cq Press.
Google Scholar
Kulaç, O., & Özgür, H. (2017). An overview of the stages (heuristics) model as a public policy analysis framework. European Scientific Journal, 13(12), 144–157.
Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. College of Business and Public Administration, University of Maryland.
Google Scholar
Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2–31.
Article Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Edelstein, H. (2010). Research, policy and practice in education. Education Canada, 50(2), 29–30.
Google Scholar
Malin, J. R., Brown, C., & Trubceac, A. S. (2018). Going for broke: A multiple-case study of brokerage in education. AERA Open, 4(2), 2332858418769297.
Article Google Scholar
Manuel, J. I., Mullen, E. J., Fang, L., Bellamy, J. L., & Bledsoe, S. E. (2009). Preparing social work practitioners to use EBP: A comparison of experiences from an implementation project. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 613–627.
Article Google Scholar
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publication.
Google Scholar
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy Press.
Book Google Scholar
Peters, M. (1996). Poststructuralism, politics, and education. critical studies in education and culture. Bergin and Garvey, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Poon, C. L. (2012). Fourth way in action: Translation of research into policy and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(1), 19–25.
Article Google Scholar
Power, C. (2007). Educational research, policy and practice in an era of globalisation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(2), 87–100.
Article Google Scholar
Renée, M. (2006). Knowledge, power, and education justice: how social movement organizations use research to influence education policy. Unpublished dissertation. Los Angeles: UCLA.
Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1986). Policy implementation and the bureaucracy. Brooks Press.
Google Scholar
Roderick, M., Easton, J. Q., & Sebring, P. B. (2007). Developing new roles for research in new policy environments: The Consortium on Chicago School Research. The University of Chicago.
Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Westview.
Google Scholar
Scott, J., & Jabbar, H. (2014). The hub and the spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentivist reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 233–257.
Article Google Scholar
Sebba, J. (2007). Enhancing impact on policymaking through increasing user engagement in research. In L. Saunders (Ed.), Educational research and policy-making: Exploring the border country between research and policy (pp. 127–143). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Tseng, V. (2012). Partnerships: Shifting the dynamics between research and practice. William T. Grant Foundation.
Google Scholar
Urquiola, M. (2015). Progress and challenges in achieving an evidence-based education policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin American Economic Review, 24(1).
van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenked, W. (2018). Barriers and conditions for teachers’ utilisation of academic knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 50–63.
Article Google Scholar
Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braaka, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316.
Article Google Scholar
Weiss, C. H. (1979). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection, 23–81.
Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education (pp. 3–27). Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar
Weiss, C. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3, 531–546.
Google Scholar
Whitty, G. (2006). Education (al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.
Article Google Scholar
Page 2
From: Closing the gap between research and policy-making to better enable effective educational practice: a proposed framework
R1 | F | 15 | Researcher within government | Charge of research activities | MoE |
R2 | M | 23 | Researcher within the private sector | Charge of research activities | Higher education institution |
R3 | M | 20 | Researcher within government | Head of education administration department | Higher education institution |
R4 | F | 17 | Researcher within the public sector | Charge of evaluating education research | Independent research center |
P1 | M | 12 | Policy-maker within government | Head of research and educational curricula department | MoE |
P2 | M | 25 | Policy-maker within government | Director of general education department | MoE |
P3 | M | 7 | Policy-maker within government | Director in the National Centre for Education Development department | MoE |
P4 | M | 10 | Policy-maker within government | Vice Dean of Administrative Affairs and Educational Development department | MoE |
P5 | F | 10 | Policy-maker within the community sector | Dealing with educational cases | Professional association |