Which of the following methods would be employed to collect sweat for chloride analysis:

A chloride sweat test helps diagnose cystic fibrosis (CF), an inherited disorder that makes kids sick by disrupting the normal function of epithelial cells. These cells make up the sweat glands in the skin and also line passageways inside the lungs, liver, pancreas, and digestive and reproductive systems. Kids who have CF are at risk for repeated lung infections.

The sweat test measures the amount of chloride in sweat. Kids with cystic fibrosis can have two to five times the normal amount of chloride in their sweat. In a sweat test, the skin is stimulated to produce enough sweat to be absorbed into a special collector and then analyzed.

Doctors may test an infant suspected of having cystic fibrosis as early as 48 hours after birth, though any test done during a baby's first month might need to be repeated because newborns may not produce enough sweat to ensure reliable results.

Why It's Done

Doctors will order a chloride sweat test for kids with positive newborn screen for cystic fibrosis, a family history of cystic fibrosis, or symptoms of the disorder. Symptoms and signs include failure to grow, repeated lung infections, and digestive problems.

Preparation

No special preparation is necessary for this test. Before having this test, your child may eat, drink, and exercise as usual, and continue to take any current medicines. Creams and lotions should not be applied to the skin 24 hours before the procedure. A sweat test usually takes about an hour, so you may want to bring books or toys to help your child pass the time.

There are no needles used in this procedure.

Page 1

The Procedure

An area of skin on the arm will be washed and dried. Next, two electrodes are attached with straps. One of these contains a disc with pilocarpine gel, a medicine that makes the sweat glands produce sweat. A weak electric current pushes the medicine through the skin. After this is done, the electrodes are removed and the skin is cleansed.

A special sweat collection device is then attached to the clean skin surface in the area where the sweat glands were stimulated. It's taped to the skin to keep it from moving. The sweat is collected for 30 minutes. The sweat that's collected turns blue when it comes into contact with blue dye within the collector, making it visible to the technician.

After enough sweat is in the tubing inside the collector, it's removed and placed in the sweat analyzer. The collector is removed and the arm is cleaned again. Your child's skin may remain red and continue sweating for several hours after the test.

Page 2

What to Expect

This test shouldn't be painful, though some kids do feel a slight tingling or tickling sensation when the electrodes apply current to the skin.

Getting the Results

Results are usually available in 1–2 days.

If your child has a sweat chloride level of more than 60 millimoles per liter, it's considered abnormal and indicates a high likelihood of cystic fibrosis, though some children with CF do have borderline or even normal sweat chloride levels. If more sweat is needed, the test might be repeated. If results are positive or unclear, a blood test may be done, especially for babies.

Risks

This test poses very little risk of complications. The electrical current may cause your child's skin to be red or to sweat excessively for a short period of time. In rare cases, the skin may look slightly sunburned.

Helping Your Child

You may choose to stay with your child to help keep him or her distracted during the test.

If You Have Questions

If you have questions about the chloride sweat test and how it's conducted, speak with your doctor.

1. Gibson LE, Cooke RE. A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics. (1959) 23:545–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Warwick WJ, Viela I, Hansen LG. Comparison of the errors due to the use of gauze and the use of filter paper in the gravimetric chloride titration sweat test. Am J Clin Pathol. (1979) 72:211–5. 10.1093/ajcp/72.2.211 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Collie JT, Massie RJ, Jones OA, LeGrys VA, Greaves RF. Sixty-five years since the New York heat wave: advances in sweat testing for cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2014) 49:106–17. 10.1002/ppul.22945 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. CLSI . Sweat testing: specimen collection and quantitative chloride analysis. CLSI Guideline C34. 4th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; (2019). [Google Scholar]

5. Massie J, Greaves R, Metz M, Wiley V, Graham P, Shepherd S, et al.. Australasian guideline (2nd Edition): an annex to the CLSI and UK Guidelines for the performance of the sweat test for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Clin Biochem Rev. (2017) 38:115–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Multi Disciplinary Working Group . Guidelines for the Performance of the Sweat Test for the Investigation of Cystic Fibrosis in the UK. 2nd ed. Birmingham: Multi Disciplinary Working Group; (2014). [Google Scholar]

7. Farrell PM, Rosenstein BJ, White TB, Accurso FJ, Castellani C, Cutting GR, et al.. Cystic fibrosis foundation. Guidelines for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns through older adults: cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus report. J Pediatr. (2008) 153:S4–14. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Sermet-Gaudelus I, Munck A, Rota M, Roussey M, Feldmann D. Recommandations Franc,aises pour la R_ealisation et l'Interpr_etation du Test de la Sueur dans le Cadre du D_epistage N_eonatal de la Mucoviscidose. Arch Fr Pediatr. (2010) 17:1349–58. 10.1016/j.arcped.2010.06.021 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Özçelik U, Karakoç F, Yüksel H, Yilmaz Ö, Gürcan N. Ulusal yenidogan tarama programi kistik fibrozis taramasi, Ter testi rehberi. Ankara. T.C. Saglik Bakanligi Türkiye Halk Sagligi Kurumu (2015). [Google Scholar]

10. Kabir AL, Roy S, Habib RB, Anwar KZ, Mollah AS, Amin R, et al.. Cystic fibrosis diagnosed using indigenously wrapped sweating technique: first large-scale study reporting socio-demographic, clinical, and laboratory features among the children in Bangladesh a lower middle income country. Glob Pediatr Health. (2020) 30:7:2333794X20967585. 10.1177/2333794X20967585 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Bienvenu T, Nguyen-Khoa T. Current and future diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: performance and limitations. Arch Pediatr. (2020) 27:eS19–24. 10.1016/S0929-693X(20)30046-4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Simmonds NJ. Is it cystic fibrosis? The challenges of diagnosing cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Respir Rev. (2019) 31:6–8. 10.1016/j.prrv.2019.02.004 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. McColley SA, Elbert A, Wu R, Ren CL, Sontag MS, LeGrys VA. Quantity not sufficient rates and delays in sweat testing in US infants with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2020) 55:3053–56. 10.1002/ppul.25027 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. LeGrys VA, Moon TC, Laux J, Accurso F, Martiniano SA. Multicenter evaluation of sweat chloride concentration and variation in infants with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. (2019) 18:190–3. 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.12.006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Cinel G, Dogru D, Yalçin E, Özçelik U, Gürcan N, Kiper N. Sweat conductivity test: can it replace chloride titration for cystic fibrosis diagnosis? Turk J Pediatr. (2012) 54:576–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Rock MJ, Makholm L, Eickhoff J. A new method of sweat testing: the cf quantum® sweat test. J Cyst Fibros. (2014) 13:520–7. 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.05.001 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Collie JT, Massie RJ, Jones OAH, Morrison PD, Greaves RF. A candidate reference method using ICP-MS for sweat chloride quantification. Clin Chem Lab Med. (2016) 54:561–7. 10.1515/cclm-2015-0506 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Gokdemir Y, Vatansever P, Karadag B, Seyrekel T, Baykan O, Ikizoglu NB, et al.. Performance evaluation of a new coulometric endpoint method in sweat testing and its comparison with classic Gibson&Cooke and chloridometer methods in cystic fibrosis. Front Pediatr. (2018) 6:133. 10.3389/fped.2018.00133 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Choi DH, Thaxton A, Jeong I, Kim K, Sosnay PR, Cutting GR, et al.. Sweat test for cystic fibrosis: Wearable sweat sensor vs. standard laboratory test. J Cyst Fibros. (2018) 17:e35–e38. 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.03.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Durč P, Foret F, Homola L, Malá M, Pokojová E, Vinohradská H, et al.. Skin wipe test: a simple, inexpensive, and fast approach in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2020) 55:1653–60. 10.1002/ppul.24758 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Dayasiri K, Hull J, Rao S. NICE guidance on diagnosis and management of cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. (2021) 106:31–4. 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316882 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Massie J, Gaskin K, Asperen PV, Wilcken B. Sweat testing following newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2000) 29:452–6. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(200006)29:6<452::AID-PPUL7>3.0.CO;2-H [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Castellani C, Duff AJA, Bell SC, Heijerman HGM, Munck A, Ratjen F, et al.. ECFS best practice guidelines: the 2018 revision. J Cyst Fibros. (2018) 17:153–78. 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.02.006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Webster HL. Laboratory diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Crit Rev Cl Lab Sci. (1983) 23:545–9. [Google Scholar]

25. Wescor Inc. Available online at: http://www.wescor.com/biomedical/cysticfibrosis/macroduct.html (accessed April 17, 2021).

26. Hammond KB, Turcios NL, Giboson LE. Clinical evaluation of the macroduct sweat collection system and conductivity analyzer in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. (1994) 124:255–60. 10.1016/S0022-3476(94)70314-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Mastella G, Di Cesare G, Borruso A, Menin L, Zanolla L. Reliability of sweat-testing by the macroduct collection method combined with conductivity analysis in comparison with the classic gibson and cook technique. Acta Paediatr. (2000) 89:933–7. 10.1080/080352500750043378 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Brown A, Jenkins L, Reid A, Leavy, McDowell G, McIlroy C, et al.. How to perform and interpret the sweat test? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. (2020) 105:230–35. 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316615 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Vermeulen F, Lebecque P, De Boeck K, Leal T. Biological variability of the sweat chloride in diagnostic sweat tests: a retrospective analysis. J Cyst Fibros. (2017) 16:30–5. 10.1016/j.jcf.2016.11.008 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. LeGrys VA, Moon TC, Laux J, Rock MJ, Accurso M. Analytical and biological variation in repeated sweat chloride concentrations in clinical trials for CFTR modulator therapy. J Cyst Fibros. (2018) 17:43–9. 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.07.008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Guglani L, Stabel D, Weiner DJ. False-positive and false-negative sweat tests: systematic review of the evidence. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. (2015) 8:198–211. 10.1089/ped.2015.0552 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Guglani L, Sitwat B, Lower D, Kurland G, Weiner DJ. Elevated sweat chloride concentration in children without cystic fibrosis who are receiving topiramate therapy. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2012) 47:429–33. 10.1002/ppul.21563 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Mattar AC, Gomes EN, Adde FV, Leone C, Mattar AC, Gomes EN, et al.. Comparison between classic gibson and cooke technique and sweat conductivity test in patients with and without cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. (2010) 86:109–14. 10.2223/JPED.1979 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Lezana JL, Vargas MH, Karam-Bechara J, Aldana RS, Furuya ME. Sweat conductivity and chloride titration for cystic fibrosis diagnosis in 3834 subjects. J Cyst Fibros. (2003) 2:1–7. 10.1016/S1569-1993(02)00146-7 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Rueegg CS, Kuehni CE, Gallati S, Jurca M, Jung A, Casaulta C, et al.. Swiss Cystic Fibrosis Screening Group. Comparison of two sweat test systems for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns. Pediatr Pulmonol. (2019) 54:264–72. 10.1002/ppul.24227 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. van Langen AV, Dompeling E, Yntema JB, Arets B, Tiddens H, Loeber G. Jeannette clinical evaluation of the nanoduct sweat test system in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after newborn screening. Eur J Pediatr. (2015) 174:1025–34. 10.1007/s00431-015-2501-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Emiralioglu N, Özçelik U, Yalçin E, Dogru D, Kiper N. Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis with chloride meter (Sherwood M926S chloride analyzer) and sweat test analysis system (CFdelta collection system) compared to the Gibson Cooke method. Turk J Pediatr. (2016) 58:27–33. 10.24953/turkjped.2016.01.004 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. RCPA Quality Assurance Programs . Sweat Electrolyte End of Cycle 27 Report. Available online at: www.rcpaqap.com.au/chempath (accessed November 10, 2013).

39. Pullan NJ, Thurston V, Barber S. Evaluation of an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry method for the analysis of sweat chloride and sodium for use in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Ann Clin Biochem. (2013) 50 (Pt 3):267–70. 10.1177/0004563212474565 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Marvelli A, Campi B, Mergni G, Di Cicco ME, Turini P, Scardina P. Sweat chloride assay by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a confirmation test for cystic fibrosis diagnosis. Anal Bioanal Chem. (2020) 412:6909–16. 10.1007/s00216-020-02821-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Kubán P, Greguš M, Pokojová E, Skričková J, Foret F. Double opposite end injection capillary electrophoresis with contactless conductometric detection for simultaneous determination of chloride, sodium and potassium in cystic fibrosis diagnosis. J Chromatogr A. (2014) 1358:293–8. 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.091 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Page 2

PMC full text:

Copyright/LicenseRequest permission to reuse

Copyright © 2021 Gokdemir and Karadag.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Click on the image to see a larger version.