In what way does the policy evaluation stage create a feedback loop in the policymaking process

• Anderson, C. W. (1979). The place of principles in policy analysis. American Political Science Review, 73(3), 711–723.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R. (2003). Promoting a research agenda in education within and beyond policy and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2(3), 171–182.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baum, L. (2003). The supreme court in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 161–180.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bellamy, J. L., Bledsoe, S. E., & Traube, D. E. (2006). The current state of evidence-based practice in social work: A review of the literature and qualitative analysis of expert interviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3(1), 23–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Benoit, F. (2013). Public policy models and their usefulness in public health: The stages model. National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy.

  Google Scholar 

• Berliner, D. C. (2008). Research, policy, and practice: The great disconnect. V S. D. Lapan (ur.) In M. T. Quartaroli (ur.) (Eds.) Reassert essentials: an introduction to designs and practices, (pp. 295–325) Jossey- Bass, str.

• Blewden, M., Carroll, P., & Witten, K. (2010). The use of social science research to inform policy development: case studies from recent immigration policy. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 5(1), 13–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-based policy making: Insights from policy minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Booker, L., Conaway, C., & Schwartz, N. (2019). Five ways RPPs can fail and how to avoid them: Applying conceptual frameworks to improve RPPs. William T. Grant Foundation.

  Google Scholar 

• Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bultitude, K., Rodari, P., Weitkamp, E., BridginCherney, A., Poveyb, J., Headb, B., Borehamb, P., & Fergusonb, M. (2012). What influences the g the gap between science and policy: the importance of mutual respect, trust and the role of mediators. Journal of Science Communication, 11(3), 1–4.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cattaneo, K. H. (2018). Applying policy theories to charter school legislation in New York: rational actor model, stage heuristics, and multiple streams. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(2), 6–24.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–34.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. P. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. (2013). Research-practice partnerships at the district level: A new strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement. Wiilliam T. Grant Foundation.

  Google Scholar 

• Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2010). Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1983). Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 16–35.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cooper, A. (2014). Knowledge mobilisation in education across Canada: A cross-case analysis of 44 research brokering organisations. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(1), 29–59.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cooper, A., & Shewchuk, S. (2015). Knowledge brokers in education: How intermediary organizations are bridging the gap between research, policy and practice internationally. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(118), n118.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

  Google Scholar 

• DeLeon, P. (1999). The stages approach to the policy process: What has it done? Where is it going. Theories of the Policy Process, 1(19), 19–32.

  Google Scholar 

• Donovan, M. S. (2013). Generating improvement through research and development in education systems. Science, 340(6130), 317–319.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Edwards, A., Sebba, J., & Rickinson, M. (2007). Working with users: Some implications for educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 647–661.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eyler, A., Brownson, R., Schmid, T., & Pratt, M. (2010). Understanding policies and physical activity: Frontiers of knowledge to improve population health. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7(s1), S9–S12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Farley-Ripple, E., & Jones, A. R. (2015). Educational contracting and the translation of research into practice: the case of data coach vendors in Delaware. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 10(2), n2.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., & Cheng, B. H. (Eds.). (2013). Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. Teachers College Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gelderblom, G., Schildkamp, K., Pieters, J., & Ehren, M. (2016). Data-based decision making for instructional improvement in primary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 1–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Practice, 25, 20–24.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 69–80.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Huberman, M. (1990). Linkages between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 363–391.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ion, G. & Iucu, R. (2015). Does research influence educational policy? The perspective of researchers and policy-makers in Romania. In The European higher education area (pp. 865–880). Springer.‏

• Ion, G., Marin, E., & Proteasa, C. (2018). How does the context of research influence the use of educational research in policy-making and practice? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 18(2), 119–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, 125, 43–62.

  Google Scholar 

• Johansson, S. (2010). Implementing EBPs and programmes in the human services: Lessons from research in public administration. European Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 109–125.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4–12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). HaperCollins.

  Google Scholar 

• Kingdon, J. W. (2010). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (3rd ed.). Longman.

  Google Scholar 

• Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2012). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Cq Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kulaç, O., & Özgür, H. (2017). An overview of the stages (heuristics) model as a public policy analysis framework. European Scientific Journal, 13(12), 144–157.

  Google Scholar 

• Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. College of Business and Public Administration, University of Maryland.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Levin, B., & Edelstein, H. (2010). Research, policy and practice in education. Education Canada, 50(2), 29–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Malin, J. R., Brown, C., & Trubceac, A. S. (2018). Going for broke: A multiple-case study of brokerage in education. AERA Open, 4(2), 2332858418769297.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Manuel, J. I., Mullen, E. J., Fang, L., Bellamy, J. L., & Bledsoe, S. E. (2009). Preparing social work practitioners to use EBP: A comparison of experiences from an implementation project. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 613–627.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publication.

  Google Scholar 

• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.

• Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Peters, M. (1996). Poststructuralism, politics, and education. critical studies in education and culture. Bergin and Garvey, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881.

• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Poon, C. L. (2012). Fourth way in action: Translation of research into policy and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(1), 19–25.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Power, C. (2007). Educational research, policy and practice in an era of globalisation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(2), 87–100.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Renée, M. (2006). Knowledge, power, and education justice: how social movement organizations use research to influence education policy. Unpublished dissertation. Los Angeles: UCLA.

• Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1986). Policy implementation and the bureaucracy. Brooks Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Roderick, M., Easton, J. Q., & Sebring, P. B. (2007). Developing new roles for research in new policy environments: The Consortium on Chicago School Research. The University of Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Westview.

  Google Scholar 

• Scott, J., & Jabbar, H. (2014). The hub and the spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentivist reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 233–257.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sebba, J. (2007). Enhancing impact on policymaking through increasing user engagement in research. In L. Saunders (Ed.), Educational research and policy-making: Exploring the border country between research and policy (pp. 127–143). Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Tseng, V. (2012). Partnerships: Shifting the dynamics between research and practice. William T. Grant Foundation.

  Google Scholar 

• Urquiola, M. (2015). Progress and challenges in achieving an evidence-based education policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin American Economic Review, 24(1).

• van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenked, W. (2018). Barriers and conditions for teachers’ utilisation of academic knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 50–63.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braaka, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weiss, C. H. (1979). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection, 23–81.

• Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education (pp. 3–27). Allyn and Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Weiss, C. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3, 531–546.

  Google Scholar 

• Whitty, G. (2006). Education (al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Page 2

From: Closing the gap between research and policy-making to better enable effective educational practice: a proposed framework